返回资讯中心

EEOC:成人娱乐工作者不意味着同意职场骚扰

HR Dive阅读约 12 分钟

原始报道

来自 HR Dive

hrdive.com

打开原文

先看摘要

这条新闻在讲什么

美国平等就业机会委员会(EEOC)与芝加哥Admiral Theatre达成20万美元和解,该剧院被指控允许顾客对女性舞者进行不必要的触摸,并对黑人舞者施加不同标准。EEOC强调,选择成为成人娱乐工作者并不构成对基于种族或性别的职场骚扰的同意。剧院将修订政策、张贴告示、培训员工,并建立拒绝入场名单。此案表明,即使是非传统行业,雇主也需对客户骚扰承担法律责任。

站内正文

详细内容

这里展示站内保存的新闻正文,支持划线和批注;需要核对来源时,可以打开原始报道。

An article from Dive Brief

Adult entertainers do not ‘consent to harassment at work,’ EEOC official says

Chicago’s Admiral Theatre in late May settled allegations it allowed customers to engage in unwanted touching of female dancers and subjected Black dancers to different standards and limits.

Published June 2, 2026

Emilie Shumway

Editor

  • Share

              Copy link
              
          
          
              
                  
                  Email
              
          
          
          
              
              LinkedIn
          
          
          
          
              
              X/Twitter
          
          
          
              
                  
                  Facebook
              
          
          
          
          
              
              Print
    
  • License

  • Add us on Google

Listen to the article

        3 min

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have

feedback

.

Dive Brief:

  • Chicago-based Admiral Theatre will pay $200,000 to settle U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claims that the venue discriminated against adult dancers on the basis of race and sex, according to court documents filed Thursday.
  • According to EEOC’s September 2024 complaint, Admiral allowed frequent unwanted touching of female dancers, subjected Black dancers to specific appearance standards not applied to other races, limited when Black dancers could be on stage, subjected Black dancers to slurs and fired a worker who petitioned for sexual assault awareness training.
  • In addition to paying $200,000 to the affected dancers, Admiral will review and revise its policies, including by posting signs throughout the venue notifying customers that unwanted touching is not permitted and by prohibiting racial discrimination and retaliation for complaints.

Dive Insight:

The lawsuit serves as a reminder that no employer that qualifies under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is exempt from enforcement, including those in unorthodox industries.

“Choosing to work as an adult entertainer does not constitute consent to harassment at work based on race or sex,” Victor Chen, an EEOC spokesperson, said in an agency release. “This settlement provides meaningful relief to the entertainers who were subject to discrimination and participated in the EEOC’s lawsuit. Further, this resolution demonstrates that federal laws against employment discrimination protect workers in all types of workplaces.”

Admiral agreed to train its managers, supervisors and security personnel on taking preventive and corrective measures against discrimination, including customer harassment. The venue will also create a “deny entry list” for customers who are the subject of repeated harassment complaints and identify security personnel who fail to address complaints and will be subject to discipline, including termination.

EEOC v. Admiral Theatre is also a reminder that employers can be legally liable for harassment and discrimination from clients, customers and vendors. EEOC has secured multiple settlements from staffing agencies after they fulfilled employers’ requests for workers of specific backgrounds, for example. And an appeals court in 2018 upheld an opinion in favor of a Costco worker who endured stalking and unwanted touching from a customer.

A spokesperson reached through Admiral Theatre’s website declined to comment on the settlement, stating the events “occurr[ed] prior to the current ownership.”

  • Add us on Google

  • Share

              Copy link
              
          
          
              
                  
                  Email
              
          
          
          
              
              LinkedIn
          
          
          
          
              
              X/Twitter
          
          
          
              
                  
                  Facebook
              
          
          
          
          
              
              Print
    
  • purchase licensing rights

Filed Under:

Compliance

RELATED

相关阅读

政策法规

美国EEOC废除旧执法计划,转向特朗普优先事项

美国平等就业机会委员会(EEOC)于2026年6月4日通过2025-2029年国家执法计划(NEP),取代2024-2028年战略执法计划。新计划聚焦DEI相关的种族和性别歧视、反美国籍歧视、保护女性工作场所单性别空间及宗教自由权,并遵循特朗普行政令,取消对差别影响责任(disparate-impact liability)的追究。民主党委员批评此举将有限资源用于执行政府议程,而非保护所有工人,可能加剧机构士气问题。

行业动态

远程工作或导致应届生失业率上升64%

斯坦福大学研究发现,招聘算法对多次申请者的系统性拒绝率达10%。Forrester预测AI将在4年内使客服岗位减半。纽约联储数据显示,远程工作可能解释了应届大学毕业生失业率上升的64%。芝加哥一家剧院因种族和性别歧视支付20万美元和解金。23%的HCM系统用户认为其显著减少了手动薪酬任务。

政策法规

OSHA检查员起诉劳工部:指控经理性骚扰,雇主自动担责?

美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)一名女性检查员起诉其雇主——美国劳工部(DOL),指控一名高级经理对她进行性骚扰,并称部门在接到投诉后未能采取适当行动。原告称,骚扰行为包括不当触摸、性暗示言论及报复行为。此案引发对政府机构内部性骚扰处理机制的质疑。此前,EEOC已明确表示,当主管实施骚扰时,雇主可能自动承担责任。案件凸显了联邦机构在遵守反骚扰法律方面的不足,以及举报人保护的重要性。

讨论 0

登录 后可发表评论

  • 还没有讨论,欢迎第一个发言。

分享到