返回资讯中心

美国EEOC废除旧执法计划,转向特朗普优先事项

HR Dive阅读约 14 分钟

原始报道

来自 HR Dive

hrdive.com

打开原文

先看摘要

这条新闻在讲什么

美国平等就业机会委员会(EEOC)于2026年6月4日通过2025-2029年国家执法计划(NEP),取代2024-2028年战略执法计划。新计划聚焦DEI相关的种族和性别歧视、反美国籍歧视、保护女性工作场所单性别空间及宗教自由权,并遵循特朗普行政令,取消对差别影响责任(disparate-impact liability)的追究。民主党委员批评此举将有限资源用于执行政府议程,而非保护所有工人,可能加剧机构士气问题。

站内正文

详细内容

这里展示站内保存的新闻正文,支持划线和批注;需要核对来源时,可以打开原始报道。

An article from

EEOC dumps strategic enforcement plan, adopts Trump-friendly alternative

The new plan focuses on DEI-based discrimination, anti-American bias and more.

Published June 5, 2026

Emilie Shumway

Editor

  • Share

              Copy link
              
          
          
              
                  
                  Email
              
          
          
          
              
              LinkedIn
          
          
          
          
              
              X/Twitter
          
          
          
              
                  
                  Facebook
              
          
          
          
          
              
              Print
    
  • License

  • Add us on Google

Listen to the article

        3 min

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have

feedback

.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Thursday adopted an enforcement plan that formalizes its commitment to President Donald Trump’s priorities.

The commission rescinded its 2024-2028 Strategic Enforcement Plan, finalized under former President Joe Biden in fall 2023, and voted to replace it with a 2025-2029 National Enforcement Plan.

The NEP outlines priorities that echo items the agency, under the direction of Chair Andrea Lucas, has repeatedly targeted over more than a year of enforcement:

  • “Remedying [diversity, equity and inclusion]-related race and sex discrimination”
  • “Protecting American workers from anti-American national origin discrimination”
  • “Defending women’s rights to single-sex spaces at work and workers’ rights to express the binary nature of sex”
  • “Protecting workers’ religious liberty rights to receive religious accommodations and be free from religious discrimination, harassment, and related retaliation.”

The plan also reaffirms EEOC’s alignment with the executive branch, noting it will “use its discretion in its deployment of its enforcement authority to advance the Administration’s policy objectives and comply with relevant Executive Orders.”

Specifically, the NEP said EEOC will comply with Trump’s April 2025 order directing the federal government to eliminate the pursuit of disparate-impact liability. Intentional discrimination is “inherently … more egregious,” the document stated.

The Biden-era plan touched on emerging issues, like discrimination resulting from artificial intelligence tools. It also specifically focused on certain groups, noting the “continued underrepresentation of women and workers of color in certain industries and sectors” were areas of particular concern, and included LGBTQ+ individuals under its umbrella of vulnerable workers.

Lucas has made waves with a focus on “even-handed” enforcement. In a recent appearance at Fortune Magazine’s Workplace Innovation Summit, she defended the agency’s approach as “widening” the aperture to include all people under EEOC’s civil rights agenda. Critics, including former officials at the agency, say EEOC has abdicated its responsibility to prevent discrimination and abandoned certain workers, like transgender individuals.

“By prioritizing intentional discrimination and underscoring that every worker must be treated as an individual under the law, this plan sharpens the agency’s focus on protecting equal opportunity for all Americans,” Lucas said in an agency press release. “It strategically directs enforcement resources toward the most serious and consequential unlawful employment practices to better safeguard workers’ civil rights nationwide.”

Kalpana Kotagal, the commission’s lone Democrat, said in a LinkedIn post that she voted against the change. “Under the guise of even-handed enforcement, this NEP seeks to redirect limited resources toward prosecuting the Administration’s grievances and protecting the Administration’s most favored groups, instead of protecting all workers,” she said.

Kotagal said the agency is understaffed, and the change in direction has wounded morale. “Regrettably, this NEP will likely exacerbate morale issues, contributing to further attrition and making it difficult for the agency to fulfill its mission,” she said.

The NEP will remain in place until a majority of the commission votes to supersede, modify or withdraw it, EEOC said.

  • Add us on Google

  • Share

              Copy link
              
          
          
              
                  
                  Email
              
          
          
          
              
              LinkedIn
          
          
          
          
              
              X/Twitter
          
          
          
              
                  
                  Facebook
              
          
          
          
          
              
              Print
    
  • purchase licensing rights

Filed Under:

Compliance

RELATED

相关阅读

行业动态

远程工作或导致应届生失业率上升64%

斯坦福大学研究发现,招聘算法对多次申请者的系统性拒绝率达10%。Forrester预测AI将在4年内使客服岗位减半。纽约联储数据显示,远程工作可能解释了应届大学毕业生失业率上升的64%。芝加哥一家剧院因种族和性别歧视支付20万美元和解金。23%的HCM系统用户认为其显著减少了手动薪酬任务。

政策法规

OSHA检查员起诉劳工部:指控经理性骚扰,雇主自动担责?

美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)一名女性检查员起诉其雇主——美国劳工部(DOL),指控一名高级经理对她进行性骚扰,并称部门在接到投诉后未能采取适当行动。原告称,骚扰行为包括不当触摸、性暗示言论及报复行为。此案引发对政府机构内部性骚扰处理机制的质疑。此前,EEOC已明确表示,当主管实施骚扰时,雇主可能自动承担责任。案件凸显了联邦机构在遵守反骚扰法律方面的不足,以及举报人保护的重要性。

政策法规

伊利诺伊州立法禁止差别影响歧视,对抗特朗普行政令

伊利诺伊州议会通过法案,禁止看似中立但实际对受保护群体造成不成比例负面影响的就业政策(如体能测试、犯罪背景调查)。此举是对特朗普2025年行政令的回应,该行政令要求联邦机构放弃差别影响责任理论。此前新泽西州已通过类似法案。专家警告雇主仍需警惕私人诉讼,并关注新兴AI技术可能带来的新差别影响问题。

讨论 0

登录 后可发表评论

  • 还没有讨论,欢迎第一个发言。

分享到